Re: [PATCH] postgres-fdw: column option to override foreign types

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Dian Fay <dian(dot)m(dot)fay(at)gmail(dot)com>, Georgios Kokolatos <gkokolatos(at)protonmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] postgres-fdw: column option to override foreign types
Date: 2021-03-04 16:48:48
Message-ID: ac4e6214-f6d8-1fe8-710b-13bef3f2be75@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3/4/21 9:28 AM, Georgios Kokolatos wrote:
>
> I am afraid I will have to :-1: this patch. Of course it is possible that I am wrong,
> so please correct me if you, or any other reviewers, think so.

I'm inclined to agree and it seems like a view on the source server is a
good compromise and eliminates the maintenance concerns.

I'm going to mark this as Waiting on Author for now, but will close it
on March 11 if there are no arguments in support.

Dian, perhaps you have another angle you'd like to try?

Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jacob Champion 2021-03-04 16:51:55 Re: Confusing behavior of psql's \e
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2021-03-04 16:47:58 Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq