Re: Re: Alter subscription..SET - NOTICE message is coming for table which is already removed

On 6/11/17 21:40, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> Thank you for the patch. The patch fixes this issue but it takes a
> long time to done ALTER SUBSCRIPTION SET PUBLICATION when
> max_sync_workers_per_subscription is set high value. Because the
> removing entry from pg_subscription_rel and launching a new table sync
> worker select a subscription relation state in the same order, the
> former doesn't catch up with latter.
> For example in my environment, when I test the following step with
> max_sync_workers_per_subscription = 15, all table sync workers were
> launched once and then killed. How about removing the entry from
> pg_subscription_rel in the inverse order?

I have committed the patch as is. Optimizations might be possible, but
let's keep in mind that the use case of changing the subscription right
after it was created is a pretty marginal case to begin with.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services