| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: SSL/TLS instead of SSL in docs |
| Date: | 2021-07-01 20:40:25 |
| Message-ID: | ab56060e-f49b-2db2-0734-156f48c25a41@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 30.06.21 22:46, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> I think consistency is the interesting aspect here. We already have a mix of
> SSL, TLS and SSL/TLS (although heavily skewed towards SSL) so we should settle
> on one and stick to it. The arguments in the NSS thread which led to this
> pointed to SSL/TLS. If we feel that the churn isn't worth it, then we should
> change all to SSL and perhaps instead just add TLS as indexterms to those
> sections.
I think it is already consistent in that it uses "SSL". Is that not the
case?
I notice that the NSS documentation also uses "SSL" almost exclusively
when referring to the SSL and TLS protocols and related APIs.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2021-07-01 21:08:50 | Re: make world and install-world without docs |
| Previous Message | Fabien COELHO | 2021-07-01 20:36:08 | Re: rand48 replacement |