Re: `make check` doesn't pass on MacOS Catalina

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet(at)singh(dot)im>, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: `make check` doesn't pass on MacOS Catalina
Date: 2022-08-06 16:10:55
Message-ID: ab361069-0d6d-20f7-7f4d-7313325c8fcf@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2022-08-06 Sa 11:25, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> I came across this when I was working on setting up some Dockerfiles for
>> the buildfarm. Apparently LD_LIBRARY_PATH doesn't work on Alpine, at
>> least out of the box, as it uses a different linker, and "make check"
>> relies on it (or the moral equivalent) if "make install" hasn't been run.
> I did some quick googling on this point. We seem not to be the only
> project having linking issues on Alpine, and yet it does support
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH according to some fairly authoritative-looking pages, eg
>
> https://www.musl-libc.org/doc/1.0.0/manual.html
>
> I suspect the situation is similar to macOS, ie there is some limitation
> somewhere on whether LD_LIBRARY_PATH gets passed through. If memory
> serves, the problem on SIP-enabled Mac is that DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH is
> cleared upon invoking bash, so that we lose it anywhere that "make"
> invokes a shell to run a subprogram. (Hmm ... I wonder whether ninja
> uses the shell ...) I don't personally care at all about Alpine, but
> maybe somebody who does could dig a little harder and characterize
> the problem there better.
>
>

We probably should care about Alpine, because it's a good distro to use
as the basis for Docker images, being fairly secure, very small, and
booting very fast.

I'll dig some more, and possibly set up a (docker based) buildfarm instance.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-08-06 16:12:56 Re: A cost issue in ORDER BY + LIMIT
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-08-06 16:06:44 Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints