| From: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: SQL/JSON features for v15 |
| Date: | 2022-08-23 19:31:06 |
| Message-ID: | ab10b5df-fcc2-5871-7027-e7f73b11559d@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 8/23/22 2:10 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 2022-08-23 Tu 13:24, Tom Lane wrote:
>> "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
>>> I saw Andrew suggest that the controversial parts of the patchset may be
>>> severable from some of the new functionality, so I would like to see
>>> that proposal and if it is enough to overcome concerns.
>> It's an interesting suggestion. Do people have the cycles available
>> to make it happen in the next few days?
>>
> I will make time although probably Nikita and/or Amit would be quicker
> than I would be.
If you all can, you have my +1 to try it and see what folks think.
Thanks,
Jonathan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2022-08-23 19:32:14 | Re: SQL/JSON features for v15 |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2022-08-23 19:13:20 | Re: Move NON_EXEC_STATIC from c.h |