Re: JSON Path and GIN Questions

From: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
Cc: Erik Wienhold <ewie(at)ewie(dot)name>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: JSON Path and GIN Questions
Date: 2023-09-14 04:04:28
Message-ID: aab40650-d292-3ece-e398-af2da8888e08@xs4all.nl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

p 9/13/23 om 22:01 schreef David E. Wheeler:
> On Sep 13, 2023, at 01:11, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> wrote:
>
>> "All use of json*() functions preclude index usage."
>>
>> That sentence is missing from the documentation.
>
> Where did that come from? Why wouldn’t JSON* functions use indexes? I see that the docs only mention operators; why would the corresponding functions behave the same?
>
> D

Sorry, perhaps my reply was a bit off-topic.
But you mentioned perhaps touching the docs and
the not-use-of-index is just so unexpected.
Compare these two statements:

select count(id) from movies where
movie @? '$ ? (@.year == 2023)'
Time: 1.259 ms
(index used)

select count(id) from movies where
jsonb_path_match(movie, '$.year == 2023');
Time: 17.260 ms
(no index used - unexpectedly slower)

With these two indexes available:
using gin (movie);
using gin (movie jsonb_path_ops);

(REL_15_STABLE; but it's the same in HEAD and
the not-yet-committed SQL/JSON patches.)

Erik Rijkers

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message vignesh C 2023-09-14 04:27:15 Re: CHECK Constraint Deferrable
Previous Message Dilip Kumar 2023-09-14 03:51:05 Re: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node