From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: killing perl2host |
Date: | 2022-02-17 18:08:01 |
Message-ID: | aa8e35e3-ca3e-fccf-ceea-ff049c010776@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/17/22 12:12, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2022-02-17 09:20:56 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> I don't think we have or have ever had a buildfarm animal targeting
>> msys. In general I think of msys as a build environment to create native
>> binaries. But if we want to support targeting msys we should have an
>> animal doing that.
> It's pretty much cygwin. Wouldn't hurt to have a dedicated animal though, I
> agree. We do have a dedicated path for it in configure.ac:
>
> case $host_os in
> ...
> cygwin*|msys*) template=cygwin ;;
>
>
>
>>> I think this means we should do the msys test in configure, inside
>>>
>>> if test "$enable_tap_tests" = yes; then
>>>
>>> and verify that $host_os != msys.
>> config/check_modules.pl is probably the right place for the test, as it
>> will be running with the perl we should be testing, and is only called
>> if we configure with TAP tests enabled.
> Makes sense.
>
>
>> perhaps something like:
>>
>>
>> my $msystem = $ENV{MSYSTEM} || 'undef';
>>
>> die "incompatible perl" if $Config{osname} eq 'msys' && $msystem ne
>> 'MSYS';
> Why tests MSYSTEM instead of $host_os?
Is that available in check_modules.pl? AFAICT it's an unexported shell
variable.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2022-02-17 18:08:55 | Re: Time to drop plpython2? |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2022-02-17 17:58:02 | Re: buildfarm warnings |