| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Doc tweak for huge_pages? |
| Date: | 2018-01-12 14:15:27 |
| Message-ID: | aa38da00-e366-9462-5307-3844a29d4460@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/1/17 10:08, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Part of the confusion is that the huge_pages setting is only for shared
> memory, whereas the kernel settings affect all memory. Is the same true
> for the proposed Windows patch?
Btw., I'm kind of hoping that the Windows patch would be committed
first, so that we don't have to rephrase this whole thing again after that.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-01-12 14:25:28 | Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2018-01-12 14:14:43 | Re: [HACKERS] Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation) |