From: | Sanjay Arora <sanjay(dot)k(dot)arora(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Harald Armin Massa[legacy]" <haraldarminmassa(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: postgreSQL & amazon ec2 cloud |
Date: | 2009-03-03 12:41:48 |
Message-ID: | aa381ec50903030441v3ee4cc3eq4fdb3f14e06c29a4@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I found today that postgres EnterpriseDB supports Amazon EC2. On a
shoestring budget EnterpriseDB is just as much an option as Oracle ;-(
So, question is what makes EnterpriseDB more suitable for the cloud than
plain vanilla postgreSQL?
Anyone?
With best regards.
Sanjay.
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Harald Armin Massa[legacy] <
haraldarminmassa(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> John,
>
> >> Is it possible to host postgreSQL on Amazon's cloud? What are the issues
> >> involved?
> >
> > in theory, sure. anything is possible.
> >
> > in practice, as I understand it from my relatively superficial reading,
> fast
> > storage is fairly expensive and limited in the EC2 compute cloud, and
> also
> > not real persistent
>
> That also was my understanding. But just today a message from AWS
> dropped in my inbox:
>
> "....Starting today, you can now launch Amazon EC2 running Windows or
> SQL Server instances in the the EU Region, ...."
>
> So there must be some way to run a relational database with EC2, as
> the storage requirements of SQL Server and PostgreSQL are not THAT
> different.
>
> Harald
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> GHUM Harald Massa
> persuadere et programmare
> Harald Armin Massa
> Spielberger Straße 49
> 70435 Stuttgart
> 0173/9409607
> no fx, no carrier pigeon
> -
> LASIK good, steroids bad?
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2009-03-03 15:01:44 | Re: postgreSQL & amazon ec2 cloud |
Previous Message | Tim Uckun | 2009-03-03 10:57:47 | Re: PostgreSQL clustering with DRBD |