From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Large expressions in indexes can't be stored (non-TOASTable) |
Date: | 2025-04-23 21:25:41 |
Message-ID: | aAla1fg-1vPeXNck@nathan |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 12:21:01PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 05:17:17PM +0530, Nisha Moond wrote:
>> 5) As Euler pointed out, logical replication already has a built-in
>> restriction for internally assigned origin names, limiting them to
>> NAMEDATALEN. Given that, only the SQL function
>> pg_replication_origin_create() is capable of creating longer origin
>> names. Would it make sense to consider moving the check into
>> pg_replication_origin_create() itself, since it seems redundant for
>> all other callers?
>> That said, if there's a possibility of future callers needing this
>> restriction at a lower level, it may be reasonable to leave it as is.
>
> pg_replication_origin_create() might be a better place. After all, that's
> where we're enforcing the name doesn't start with "pg_" and, for testing,
> _does_ start with "regress_". Plus, it seems highly unlikely that any
> other callers of replorigin_create() will ever provide names longer than
> 512 bytes.
Here is a new version of the patch with this change.
--
nathan
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v4-0001-Remove-pg_replication_origin-s-TOAST-table.patch | text/plain | 7.3 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2025-04-23 21:33:41 | Re: Large expressions in indexes can't be stored (non-TOASTable) |
Previous Message | Robin Haberkorn | 2025-04-23 21:25:08 | Re: [PATCH] contrib/xml2: xslt_process() should report XSLT-related error details |