| From: | Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Wolfgang Walther <walther(at)technowledgy(dot)de>, Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER |
| Date: | 2025-04-23 20:12:55 |
| Message-ID: | aAlJx6LjffHj-Rcz@msg.df7cb.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Re: Jacob Champion
> Also: since the libpq-oauth-18 and libpq-oauth-19 packages can be
> installed side-by-side safely, isn't the upgrade hazard significantly
> diminished? (If a user uninstalls the previous libpq-oauth version
> while they're still running that version of libpq in memory, _and_
> they've somehow never used OAuth until right that instant... it's easy
> enough for them to undo their mistake while the application is still
> running.)
Uhm, so far the plan was to have one "libpq-oauth" package, not several.
Since shipping a single libpq5.deb package for all PG majors has worked well
for the past decades, I wouldn't want to complicate that now.
Christoph
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sami Imseih | 2025-04-23 20:20:27 | Re: Conflicting updates of command progress |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2025-04-23 19:56:06 | Re: Cygwin support |