Re: Constraint documentation

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: Lætitia Avrot <laetitia(dot)avrot(at)gmail(dot)com>, bpd0018(at)gmail(dot)com, vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Constraint documentation
Date: 2018-07-13 08:14:10
Message-ID: a98429ff-6b4e-05b6-c7b9-69a4478049a8@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 07.07.18 10:23, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> I'm not sure what is the suggestion wrt to the documentation text. Is the
> issue only with the first introductory sentence? Would removing it be
> enough?

Yes. But it would be even better to fix pg_dump.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yotsunaga, Naoki 2018-07-13 08:16:00 RE: automatic restore point
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-07-13 08:11:51 Re: [PATCH] Include application_name in "connection authorized" log message