From: | Rajesh Kumar Mallah <mallah(dot)rajesh(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Scott Carey <scott(at)richrelevance(dot)com>, Matthew Wakeling <matthew(at)flymine(dot)org>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: suggestions for postgresql setup on Dell 2950 , PERC6i controller |
Date: | 2009-02-18 09:03:48 |
Message-ID: | a97c77030902180103m25a28e89n808247f7645d3a06@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> have you tried hanging bunch of raid1 to linux's md, and let it do
> raid0 for you ?
Hmmm , i will have only 3 bunches in that case as system has to boot
from first bunch
as system has only 8 drives. i think reducing spindles will reduce perf.
I also have a SATA SAN though from which i can boot!
but the server needs to be rebuilt in that case too.
I (may) give it a shot.
regds
-- mallah.
> I heard plenty of stories where this actually sped up performance. One
> noticeable is case of youtube servers.
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alexander Gorban | 2009-02-18 10:24:07 | Re: Call of function inside trigger much slower than explicit function call |
Previous Message | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz | 2009-02-18 08:57:25 | Re: suggestions for postgresql setup on Dell 2950 , PERC6i controller |