From: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de> |
Subject: | Re: Online enabling of checksums |
Date: | 2018-02-28 21:07:16 |
Message-ID: | a96b0ea7-616c-3246-92f8-80dac760db64@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 02/28/2018 08:42 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I noticed that pg_verify_checksum takes an "-o oid" argument to only
> check the relation with that OID; but that's wrong, because the number
> is a relfilenode, not an OID (since it's compared to the on-disk file
> name). I would suggest changing everything to clarify that it's a
> pg_class.relfilenode value, otherwise it's going to be very confusing.
> Maybe use "-f filenode" if -f is available?
>
I'd argue this is merely a mistake in the --help text. Firstly,
relfilenodes are OIDs too, so I don't think "-o" is incorrect. Secondly,
the SGML docs actually say:
<varlistentry>
<term><option>-o <replaceable>relfilenode</replaceable></option></term>
<listitem>
<para>
Only validate checksums in the relation with specified relfilenode.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
regards
--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Darafei Praliaskouski | 2018-02-28 21:43:08 | Re: Cast jsonb to numeric, int, float, bool |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2018-02-28 21:00:13 | Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 |