| From: | Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mark Rofail <markm(dot)rofail(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hans-Jürgen Schönig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays |
| Date: | 2018-02-03 15:14:32 |
| Message-ID: | a942231d-23ba-a9fd-ed43-f3ae046b50a7@proxel.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 02/01/2018 04:17 PM, Mark Rofail wrote:
> since its a polymorphic function it only passes if the `anyarray` is the
> same type of the `anyelement` so we are sure they are the same type.
> Can't we get the type from the anyarray ? the type is already stored in
> ` arr_type`.
In theory, yes, but I saw no obvious way to get it without major changes
to the code. Unless I am missing something, of course.
If I am right my recommendation for getting this patch in is to
initially skip the new operators and go back to the version of the patch
which uses @>.
Andreas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Rofail | 2018-02-03 15:19:06 | Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-02-03 13:49:35 | Re: Regexp named capture groups |