Re: A failure of standby to follow timeline switch

On 2020/12/25 12:03, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> Thank you for looking this.
>
> At Thu, 24 Dec 2020 15:33:04 +0900, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote in
>> When I applied two patches in the master branch and
>> ran "make check-world", I got the following error.
>>
>> ============== creating database "contrib_regression" ==============
>> # Looks like you planned 37 tests but ran 36.
>> # Looks like your test exited with 255 just after 36.
>> t/001_stream_rep.pl ..................
>> Dubious, test returned 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00)
>> Failed 1/37 subtests
>> ...
>> Test Summary Report
>> -------------------
>> t/001_stream_rep.pl (Wstat: 65280 Tests: 36 Failed: 0)
>> Non-zero exit status: 255
>> Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 37 tests but ran 36.
>> Files=21, Tests=239, 302 wallclock secs ( 0.10 usr 0.05 sys + 41.69
>> cusr 39.84 csys = 81.68 CPU)
>> Result: FAIL
>> make[2]: *** [check] Error 1
>> make[1]: *** [check-recovery-recurse] Error 2
>> make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>> t/070_dropuser.pl ......... ok
>
> Mmm. I retried that and saw it succeed (with 0002 applied).
>
> If I modified "user Test::More tests => 37" to 38 in the perl file, I
> got a similar result.

What happens if you run make check-world with -j 4? When I ran that,
the test failed. But with -j 1, the test finished with success. I'm not sure
why this happened, though..

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION