| From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Danil Anisimow <anisimow(dot)d(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Comments on Custom RMGRs |
| Date: | 2024-08-04 15:36:28 |
| Message-ID: | a7841fc0ce1ac04fe303f0abe4e7db23dca89172.camel@j-davis.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2024-07-23 at 16:21 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> So, I got a feeling that adding this to the rmgr interface is not
> quite
> right. The rmgr callbacks are for things that run when WAL is
> *replayed*, while checkpoints are related to how WAL is generated.
> Let's
> design this as an independent hook, separate from rmgrs.
That's a good way to look at it, agreed.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ilya Gladyshev | 2024-08-04 18:19:57 | Re: optimizing pg_upgrade's once-in-each-database steps |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2024-08-04 14:28:36 | Re: PG 17 and GUC variables |