From: | Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
Cc: | Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "Imai, Yoshikazu" <imai(dot)yoshikazu(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Speed up transaction completion faster after many relations are accessed in a transaction |
Date: | 2022-08-02 19:04:11 |
Message-ID: | a77e45dd-bd41-6196-ed66-884a830f0e66@timescale.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
This entry has been waiting on author input for a while (our current
threshold is roughly two weeks), so I've marked it Returned with
Feedback.
Once you think the patchset is ready for review again, you (or any
interested party) can resurrect the patch entry by visiting
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/38/3501/
and changing the status to "Needs Review", and then changing the
status again to "Move to next CF". (Don't forget the second step;
hopefully we will have streamlined this in the near future!)
Thanks,
--Jacob
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2022-08-02 19:19:39 | Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade |
Previous Message | Jacob Champion | 2022-08-02 18:58:06 | Re: [WIP] Allow pg_upgrade to copy segments of the same relfilenode in parallel |