From: | Koichi Suzuki <koichi(dot)szk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: V4 of PITR performance improvement for 8.4 |
Date: | 2009-01-26 07:49:03 |
Message-ID: | a778a7260901252349g24f6b1deya6e9b9bfed8697e5@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
It's simply because we should not refer to system catalog during the recovery.
2009/1/25 Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>:
>
> Koichi Suzuki <koichi(dot)szk(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>
>> Please find enclosed 2nd patch of pg_readahead which include a patch
>> to bufer manager to skip prefetch of pages already in shared buffer.
>
> I'm a bit confused by this comment. PrefetchBuffer already checks if the page
> is in shared buffers.
>
> What is tricky to avoid is prefetching the same page twice -- since the first
> prefetch doesn't actually put it in shared buffers there's no way to avoid
> prefetching it again unless you keep some kind of hash of recently prefetched
> buffers.
>
> For the index scan case I'm debating about whether to add such a cache
> directly to PrefetchBuffer -- in which case it would remember if some other
> scan prefetched the same buffer -- or to keep it in the index scan code.
>
> --
> Gregory Stark
> EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
> Ask me about EnterpriseDB's On-Demand Production Tuning
>
--
------
Koichi Suzuki
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2009-01-26 07:58:02 | gin fast insert performance |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-01-26 07:48:20 | Re: FATAL: could not open relation pg_tblspc/491086/467369/491103: No such file or directory |