Re: Questions about document "Concurrenry control" section

From: iseki <admin(at)iseki(dot)space>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Questions about document "Concurrenry control" section
Date: 2024-10-11 13:00:25
Message-ID: a767cf97-1743-4dd7-add2-4eb0587efb25@iseki.space
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Oh sorry, I should use [reply to all] instead of [reply]. I don't have
much experience with mailing lists...

But why the mailing list haven't use the "Reply-To" header specify where
to reply? Because the mail is you send to me directly?

Thank you.

On 2024/10/11 14:53, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Fri, 2024-10-11 at 11:04 +0800, admin(at)iseki(dot)space wrote:
>> Maybe add the whole example or the URL to the document is better?
> You shouldn't address that reply to me personally...
>
> Yours,
> Laurenz Albe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Durgamahesh Manne 2024-10-11 13:31:50 Fwd: Inefficient use of index scan on 2nd column of composite index during concurrent activity
Previous Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2024-10-11 12:48:19 Re: Question on indexes