From: | "Alex Deucher" <alexdeucher(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Jeff Frost" <jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Guido Neitzer" <lists(at)event-s(dot)net>, "PostgreSQL Performance" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: strange performance regression between 7.4 and 8.1 |
Date: | 2007-03-02 23:31:28 |
Message-ID: | a728f9f90703021531t63cead2blb625e5afc47e337@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 3/2/07, Jeff Frost <jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Mar 2007, Guido Neitzer wrote:
>
> > On 02.03.2007, at 14:20, Alex Deucher wrote:
> >
> >> Ah OK. I see what you are saying; thank you for clarifying. Yes,
> >> the SAN is configured for maximum capacity; it has large RAID 5
> >> groups. As I said earlier, we never intended to run a DB on the SAN,
> >> it just happened to come up, hence the configuration.
> >
> > So why not dumping the stuff ones, importing into a PG configured to use
> > local discs (Or even ONE local disc, you might have the 16GB you gave as a
> > size for the db on the local machine, right?) and testing whether the problem
> > is with PG connecting to the SAN. So you have one factor less to consider
> > after all your changes.
> >
> > Maybe it's just that something in the chain from PG to the actual HD spindles
> > kills your random access performance for getting the actual rows.
>
> I am actually starting to think that the SAN may be introducing some amount of
> latency that is enough to kill your random IO which is what all of the queries
> in question are doing - look up in index - fetch row from table.
>
> If you have the time, it would be totally worth it to test with a local disk
> and see how that affects the speed.
>
> I would think that even with RAID5, a SAN with that many spindles would be
> quite fast in raw throughput, but perhaps it's just seek latency that's
> killing you.
>
> When you run the bonnie tests again, take note of what the seeks/sec is
> compared with the old disk. Also, you should run bonnie with the -b switch to
> see if that causes significant slowdown of the writes...maybe minor synced
> write activity to pg_xlog is bogging the entire system down. Is the system
> spending most of its time in IO wait?
>
> Also, another item of note might be the actual on disk DB size..I wonder if it
> has changed significantly going from SQL_ASCII to UTF8.
>
> In 8.1 you can do this:
>
> SELECT datname,
> pg_size_pretty(pg_database_size(datname)) AS size
> FROM pg_database;
>
> In 7.4, you'll need to install the dbsize contrib module to get the same info.
>
I'm beginning the think the same thing. I'm planning to try the tests
above next week. I'll let you know what I find out.
Thanks!
Alex
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2007-03-03 00:52:22 | Re: Performance Query |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-03-02 23:23:53 | Re: stats collector process high CPU utilization |