Re: PG 17 and GUC variables

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
To: Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 17 and GUC variables
Date: 2024-08-04 08:45:27
Message-ID: a71a4581-3114-4a10-842e-cb7ab69bf1dc@iki.fi
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 04/08/2024 06:29, Robert Treat wrote:
> I was looking at trace_connection_negotiation and ran across this
> commit removing it's mention from the release notes because it is
> undocumented: https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=95cabf542f04b634303f899600ea62fb256a08c2
>
> Why is the right solution to remove it from the release notes rather
> than to document it properly? It's not like people won't notice a new
> GUC has popped up in their configs. Also, presumaing I'm unerstanding
> it's purpose correctly, ISTM it would fit along side other trace_*
> gucs in https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/runtime-config-developer.html#RUNTIME-CONFIG-DEVELOPER.

Not sure whether it's worth mentioning in release notes, but I think
you're right that it should be listed in that docs section. How about
the attached description?

I see that there are two more developer-only GUCs that are not listed in
the docs:

trace_syncscan
optimize_bounded_sort

There's a comment on them that says "/* this is undocumented because not
exposed in a standard build */", but that seems like a weak reason,
given that many of the other options in that docs section also require
additional build-time options. I think we should add those to the docs
too for the sake of completeness.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
Neon (https://neon.tech)

Attachment Content-Type Size
document-trace_connection_negotiation.patch text/x-patch 1.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrey M. Borodin 2024-08-04 10:50:37 Re: UUID v7
Previous Message Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) 2024-08-04 07:52:09 RE: Conflict detection and logging in logical replication