Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment

From: Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment
Date: 2020-06-02 18:25:15
Message-ID: a6e72990-cb54-f218-8111-0b3d897803cf@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 6/2/20 4:59 AM, Grigory Smolkin wrote:
>
>
> On 6/2/20 11:22 AM, Ron wrote:
>> The inability to do a point-in-time restoration of a *single* database in
>> a multi-db cluster is a serious -- and fundamental -- missing feature
>> (never to be implemented because of the fundamental design).
> It is possible via 3rd party tools like pg_probackup and pgbackrest.

pgbackrest does *not* support PITR recovery of individual databases into
*new* database names in the same cluster (so that the end user can have both
the current database and an old version at the same time).

--
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2020-06-02 18:30:39 Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment
Previous Message Ron 2020-06-02 18:22:14 Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment