From: | Achilleas Mantzios <achill(at)matrix(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: New Oracle system in our house, migration chances |
Date: | 2022-01-13 14:15:57 |
Message-ID: | a6be734c-fe6c-a0c2-4b8f-add426200f47@matrix.gatewaynet.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On 13/1/22 4:12 μ.μ., Kenneth Marshall wrote:
>>> Hi Achilleas,
>>> I would go with version B - since as I understand it's ISV
>>> solution. Meaning the postgres ddl was tested and aligned with the
>>> application layer, otherwise you would need to fix app layer after
>>> the migration.
>> Dziekuje Alicija. The powerbuilder app is in-house developed, source
>> is available, what could be wrong with the app? Browsing through the
>> powerbuilder source I don't see (by eye) anything that could break
>> something in PgSQL.
>> --
>> Achilleas Mantzios
>> DBA, Analyst, IT Lead
>> IT DEPT
>> Dynacom Tankers Mgmt
> Hi Achilleas,
>
> If the schema and usage is straight-forward, I would recommend using
> ora2pg to give you an estimation cost for your migration by letting you
> know what cannot be automatically translated. Once you have that you
> will be better informed as to the work needed.
Thank you Ken!
>
> Regards,
> Ken
>
>
--
Achilleas Mantzios
DBA, Analyst, IT Lead
IT DEPT
Dynacom Tankers Mgmt
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Achilleas Mantzios | 2022-01-13 14:20:02 | Re: New Oracle system in our house, migration chances |
Previous Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2022-01-13 14:13:21 | Re: New Oracle system in our house, migration chances |