Re: [PATCH] Constify proclist.h

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Constify proclist.h
Date: 2023-01-19 08:52:57
Message-ID: a68bd187-fe3c-cebd-2131-497b2d850394@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 17.01.23 13:18, Aleksander Alekseev wrote:
> This is a follow-up to [1] and c8ad4d81.
>
>> Additionally Bharath pointed out that there are other pieces of code
>> that we may want to change in a similar fashion,
>> proclist.h/proclist_types.h as one example. I didn't do this yet
>> because I would like to know the community opinion first on whether we
>> should do this at all.
>
> Since the consensus seems to be to constify everything possible here
> is the patch for proclist.h. There is nothing to change in
> proclist_types.h.
>
> [1]: https://postgr.es/m/CAJ7c6TM2%3D08mNKD9aJg8vEY9hd%2BG4L7%2BNvh30UiNT3kShgRgNg%40mail.gmail.com

committed

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nitin Jadhav 2023-01-19 08:56:26 Re: Improve GetConfigOptionValues function
Previous Message vignesh C 2023-01-19 08:51:01 Re: Support logical replication of DDLs