Re: [PATCH] Add loongarch native checksum implementation.

From: YANG Xudong <yangxudong(at)ymatrix(dot)cn>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, wengyanqing(at)ymatrix(dot)cn, wanghao(at)ymatrix(dot)cn, John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, huchangqi <huchangqi(at)loongson(dot)cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add loongarch native checksum implementation.
Date: 2023-07-26 05:36:16
Message-ID: a6301207-6ee8-8d5d-88d3-55cf51913ba5@ymatrix.cn
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2023/7/26 11:16, Michael Paquier wrote> The performance numbers
presented upthread for the CRC computations
> are kind of nice in this environment, but honestly I have no idea how
> much this architecture is used. Perhaps that's only something in
> China? I am not seeing much activity around that in Japan, for
> instance, and that's really close.

The architecture is pretty new (to open source ecosystem). The support
of it in Linux kernel and GCC were released last year.

Here is a site about the status of major open source project support of
it. (Chinese only)

https://areweloongyet.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2023-07-26 05:42:41 Re: [PATCH] Reuse Workers and Replication Slots during Logical Replication
Previous Message shveta malik 2023-07-26 05:01:32 Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby