Re: pg_advisory_lock lock FAILURE / What does those numbers mean (process 240828 waits for ExclusiveLock on advisory lock [1167570,16820923,3422556162,1];)?

From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Alexandru Lazarev <alexandru(dot)lazarev(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_advisory_lock lock FAILURE / What does those numbers mean (process 240828 waits for ExclusiveLock on advisory lock [1167570,16820923,3422556162,1];)?
Date: 2019-07-19 19:27:20
Message-ID: a60f7f2748298ebe6de022df9b600cdb7d7ab143.camel@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-sql

On Fri, 2019-07-19 at 21:15 +0300, Alexandru Lazarev wrote:
> I receive locking failure on pg_advisory_lock, I do deadlock condition and receive following:
> - - -
> ERROR: deadlock detected
> SQL state: 40P01
> Detail: Process 240828 waits for ExclusiveLock on advisory lock [1167570,16820923,3422556162,1]; blocked by process 243637.
> Process 243637 waits for ExclusiveLock on advisory lock [1167570,16820923,3422556161,1]; blocked by process 240828.
> - - -
> I do from Tx1:
> select pg_advisory_lock(72245317596090369);
> select pg_advisory_lock(72245317596090370);
> and from Tx2:
> select pg_advisory_lock(72245317596090370);
> select pg_advisory_lock(72245317596090369);
>
> where long key is following: 72245317596090369-> HEX 0x0100AABBCC001001
> where 1st byte (highest significance "0x01") is namespace masked with MAC Address " AABBCC001001", but in error i see 4 numbers - what is their meaning?
> I deducted that 2nd ( 16820923 .) HEX 0x100AABB, 1st half of long key) and 3rd is ( 3422556161 -> HEX 0xCC001001, 2nd half of long key)
> but what are 1st ( 1167570 ) and 4th (1) numbers?

See this code in src/backend/utils/adt/lockfuncs.c:

/*
* Functions for manipulating advisory locks
*
* We make use of the locktag fields as follows:
*
* field1: MyDatabaseId ... ensures locks are local to each database
* field2: first of 2 int4 keys, or high-order half of an int8 key
* field3: second of 2 int4 keys, or low-order half of an int8 key
* field4: 1 if using an int8 key, 2 if using 2 int4 keys
*/
#define SET_LOCKTAG_INT64(tag, key64) \
SET_LOCKTAG_ADVISORY(tag, \
MyDatabaseId, \
(uint32) ((key64) >> 32), \
(uint32) (key64), \
1)
#define SET_LOCKTAG_INT32(tag, key1, key2) \
SET_LOCKTAG_ADVISORY(tag, MyDatabaseId, key1, key2, 2)

Yours,
Laurenz Albe
--
Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter J. Holzer 2019-07-19 19:39:56 Re: Rearchitecting for storage
Previous Message Alexandru Lazarev 2019-07-19 18:15:03 pg_advisory_lock lock FAILURE / What does those numbers mean (process 240828 waits for ExclusiveLock on advisory lock [1167570,16820923,3422556162,1];)?

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexandru Lazarev 2019-07-19 19:52:05 Re: pg_advisory_lock lock FAILURE / What does those numbers mean (process 240828 waits for ExclusiveLock on advisory lock [1167570,16820923,3422556162,1];)?
Previous Message Alexandru Lazarev 2019-07-19 18:15:03 pg_advisory_lock lock FAILURE / What does those numbers mean (process 240828 waits for ExclusiveLock on advisory lock [1167570,16820923,3422556162,1];)?