| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jan Wieck <jan(at)wi3ck(dot)info> |
| Cc: | "Dean Gibson (DB Administrator)" <postgresql(at)mailpen(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster |
| Date: | 2021-05-29 02:41:08 |
| Message-ID: | a5f729df-2a6c-41e3-3100-7075bf59f4f3@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
On 5/28/21 10:27 PM, Jan Wieck wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, May 28, 2021, 17:15 Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net
> <mailto:andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> AIUI he did an RDS upgrade. Surely that's not doing a dump/restore? I
> assume you would know better than him or me what it actually does
> do :-)
>
>
> Since I am not working at AWS I can't tell for sure. ;)
Apologies, my mistake then.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christophe Pettus | 2021-05-29 02:43:23 | Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster |
| Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2021-05-29 02:32:04 | Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christophe Pettus | 2021-05-29 02:43:23 | Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster |
| Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2021-05-29 02:27:05 | Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster |