Re: Non-superuser subscription owners

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Non-superuser subscription owners
Date: 2021-11-18 18:50:29
Message-ID: a5ec07f379f8c55726fd0722b3196e6b7f5ff589.camel@j-davis.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2021-11-17 at 16:17 -0800, Mark Dilger wrote:
> Some of what I perceive as the screwiness of your argument I must
> admin is not your fault. The properties of subscriptions are defined
> in ways that don't make sense to me. It would be far more sensible
> if connection strings were objects in their own right, and you could
> grant USAGE on a connection string to a role,

We sort of have that with CREATE SERVER, in fact dblink can use a
server instead of a string.

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2021-11-18 19:06:38 Re: Should rename "startup process" to something else?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-11-18 18:39:04 Re: Mixing CC and a different CLANG seems like a bad idea