From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Non-superuser subscription owners |
Date: | 2021-11-18 18:50:29 |
Message-ID: | a5ec07f379f8c55726fd0722b3196e6b7f5ff589.camel@j-davis.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2021-11-17 at 16:17 -0800, Mark Dilger wrote:
> Some of what I perceive as the screwiness of your argument I must
> admin is not your fault. The properties of subscriptions are defined
> in ways that don't make sense to me. It would be far more sensible
> if connection strings were objects in their own right, and you could
> grant USAGE on a connection string to a role,
We sort of have that with CREATE SERVER, in fact dblink can use a
server instead of a string.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2021-11-18 19:06:38 | Re: Should rename "startup process" to something else? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-11-18 18:39:04 | Re: Mixing CC and a different CLANG seems like a bad idea |