Re: Experiences with extensibility

From: Clodoaldo <clodoaldo(dot)pinto(dot)neto(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Sim Zacks" <sim(at)compulab(dot)co(dot)il>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Experiences with extensibility
Date: 2008-01-09 14:21:12
Message-ID: a595de7a0801090621r4da88a19g1b4733681433a6b4@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

2008/1/9, Sim Zacks <sim(at)compulab(dot)co(dot)il>:
>
> The reason companies go with the closed source, expensive solutions is because
> they are better products.

Not necessarily. FOSS products don't have a selling team to persuade
and bribe people. Expensive solutions, and that is in part what make
them expensive, can spend lots of time persuading and can offer good
money to those who decide which is the "best" product. Those who
decide are not the coders or db admins and in general don't really
care much.

Regards, Clodoaldo Pinto Neto

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ivan Sergio Borgonovo 2008-01-09 14:28:04 Re: count(*) and bad design was: Experiences with extensibility
Previous Message cdecarlo 2008-01-09 14:14:10 Re: Setting variables equal to elements from an Array