From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Matheus Alcantara <msalcantara(dot)dev(at)pm(dot)me> |
Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PROPOSAL] Make PSQLVAR on \getenv opitional |
Date: | 2021-12-28 20:45:40 |
Message-ID: | a58c208c-4828-abe7-dde2-ec4a9a19da61@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/28/21 14:53, Tom Lane wrote:
> Matheus Alcantara <msalcantara(dot)dev(at)pm(dot)me> writes:
>>> it is not consistent with other \g* commands. Maybe a new statement \senv ? But what is the use case? You can just press ^z and inside shell write echo $xxx, and then fg
>> I think that the basic use case would be just for debugging, instead call \getenv and them \echo, we could just use \getenv. I don't see any other advantages, It would just be to
>> write fewer commands. I think that ^z and then fg is a good alternative, since this behavior would be inconsistent.
> You don't even need to do that much. This works fine:
>
> postgres=# \! echo $PATH
>
> So I'm not convinced that we need another way to spell that.
> (Admittedly, this probably doesn't work on Windows, but
> I gather that environment variables are less interesting there.)
>
>
I haven't tested, but I'm fairly sure
postgres=# \! echo %PATH%
would do the trick on Windows.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2021-12-28 21:04:27 | Re: Column Filtering in Logical Replication |
Previous Message | Matheus Alcantara | 2021-12-28 20:18:57 | Re: [PROPOSAL] Make PSQLVAR on \getenv opitional |