Re: Expand applicability of aggregate's sortop optimization

From: Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Expand applicability of aggregate's sortop optimization
Date: 2024-12-11 08:04:01
Message-ID: a5729ce1-0c4d-4b28-af1e-7fa8048a01d7@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/12/2024 07:22, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 01:05:04PM +0700, Andrei Lepikhov wrote:
>> Rebase onto current master and slight improvement.
>
> Your patch is failing in the CI, please rebase. I have it to the next
> CF for now, waiting on author.
Thanks! I have observed such issues before, but their complexity is out
of my league yet. Why can a prosupport function cause deadlock in a
simple query? That's the question to discover.

--
regards, Andrei Lepikhov

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2024-12-11 08:07:02 Re: Parallel heap vacuum
Previous Message Bertrand Drouvot 2024-12-11 07:56:30 Re: Make use of pg_memory_is_all_zeros() in more places