On 11/12/07, Hans-Peter Oeri <hp(at)oeri(dot)ch> wrote:
> Thanks for your input... However, you're ignoring the index field order
> - which might differ from attribute order. At least some querys need
> 'correct' index orders, like foreign key (field) relations: the field at
> index position 2 in table a relates to the field at index position 2 in
> table b.
Can you give details on what you're doing that depends on such ordering?
Just to have a better background of your requirements.