| From: | "Rodrigo De Leon" <rdeleonp(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Aaron Bono" <postgresql(at)aranya(dot)com>, rdeleonp(at)yahoo(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: Wrap (obfuscate) code |
| Date: | 2006-07-05 01:38:27 |
| Message-ID: | a55915760607041838y5edabeb9hed6783bdcc22f01e@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On 7/4/06, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> I have more then once been in an environment where, "Oh we just "sampled" the
> function from *xyz*".
That's precisely the reason I was asking, because my colleagues and I
had that same experience with Oracle packages when doing consulting
work for a customer.
After an incident where the customer's IT department had taken the
decision to try and *improve* the code we delivered, we just gave them
the original, untainted packages in wrapped format, and went on our
merry ways.
I would be quite a bonus to have equivalent functionality in PG.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-07-05 01:51:43 | Re: Wrap (obfuscate) code |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-07-04 23:56:18 | Re: Wrap (obfuscate) code |