Re: comparision chart

From: Troels Arvin <troels(at)arvin(dot)dk>
To: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: comparision chart
Date: 2002-02-21 13:47:12
Message-ID: a52tot$1gl5$1@jupiter.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

On Wed, 20 Feb 2002 07:08:46 +0100, "Christopher Sawtell"
<csawtell(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz> wrote:

> mysql
> ------
[...]

MySQL has a well-documented replication system (which also works well, I
hear). Simple one-way replication seems easy to set up.

> postgresql
> -----------

There doesn't seem to be a consensus about how to replicate PostgreSQL
databases.

(Normally, I don't advocate MySQL before PostgreSQL, but as this
discussion shows, there _are_ areas where MySQL is in front.)

--
Greetings from Troels Arvin, Copenhagen, Denmark

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2002-02-21 14:13:52 Re: Dates and year 2000
Previous Message Andy Marden 2002-02-21 09:27:31 Re: Dates and year 2000