Re: DBD::Pg performance bites compared to DBD::mysql?

From: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
To: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: DBD::Pg performance bites compared to DBD::mysql?
Date: 2005-08-22 01:47:27
Message-ID: a506413d3915097ec54422522fbe4a18@biglumber.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


> Cool. Thanks for doing that. Do you have an idea when 1.44 will
> be out?

Not really, I'm afraid. I was tracking down a quoting issue this weekend
and have now gone down a twisty path that induced ripping out and
rewriting most of the "type" and quoting code, which is now lying in
pieces in my work directory. :) If I get the time to finish it soon, maybe
a release in two weeks or so. Otherwise, I might just back out the changes
and release the new do() as 1.44.

And if everyone reading this who uses DBD::Pg could test the code in cvs
right now, that would be greatly appreciated: there were some substantial
changes that I'd love to catch any bugs on before rather than after the
next release. I'll even roll up a tarball for your testing pleasure:

http://www.gtsm.com/DBD-Pg-1.43_1.tar.gz

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200508212142
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFDCS6KvJuQZxSWSsgRAkzKAKCvCzjpvpzVSdqCrL4VLy0vkDj5rwCgwYz6
TNfaqozZ4aUUuaY4YeuFGsI=
=YpRL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-08-22 20:27:45 Re: ECPG and escape strings
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-08-22 01:25:56 Re: DBD::Pg performance bites compared to DBD::mysql?