| From: | chadzakary(at)hotmail(dot)com (Chad) |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BTrees with record numbers |
| Date: | 2004-03-04 22:01:39 |
| Message-ID: | a4e918e3.0403041401.11e992f6@posting.google.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Guys, thanks fo rthe replies.
I'm talking about the stuff that the other poster (cant see his name
right now, sorry) doubts will ever be in postgres. ie you can seek to
anywhere in the Btree using a row offset as a "search" key.
I'd love to hear why this would be hard to support in a materialized
view. Could you explain that ? Berkeley DB supports it.
Chad
hannu(at)tm(dot)ee (Hannu Krosing) wrote in message news:<1078220441(dot)2621(dot)0(dot)camel(at)fuji(dot)krosing(dot)net>...
> Chad kirjutas R, 27.02.2004 kell 14:53:
> > Is it possible for Postgres Btrees to support access by logical row number ?
>
> WHat do you mean by "logical row number" ?
>
> ------------
> Hannu
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Anthony_Barker | 2004-03-04 22:16:43 | Scalable postgresql using sys_epoll |
| Previous Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2004-03-04 21:57:10 | Minutes from Pl/Java - next step IRC |