From: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Steven Pousty <steve(dot)pousty(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pierre Giraud <pierre(dot)giraud(at)dalibo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? |
Date: | 2020-04-27 01:23:54 |
Message-ID: | a47ea348-b9a0-02b7-5bcb-7a32143dd16f@postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 4/26/20 3:21 PM, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
> On 4/26/20 1:40 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I wrote:
>>> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>
>> There is a small problem with getting this to work in the webstyle
>> HTML: somebody decided it would be a great idea to have a global
>> override on paragraph margin-bottom settings. For the purposes of
>> this test I just deleted that from main.css, but I suppose we want
>> some more-nuanced solution in reality.
>
> I have to see why that is. I traced it back to the original "bring doc
> styles up to modern website" patch (66798351) and there is missing
> context. Anyway, I'd like to test it before a wholesale removal (there
> is often a strong correlation between "!important" and "hack", so I'll
> want to further dive into it).
>
> I'll have some time to play around with the CSS tonight.
Can you try
#docContent p {
- margin-bottom: 1rem !important;
+ margin-bottom: 1rem;
}
and see how it looks?
Jonathan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2020-04-27 01:41:47 | Re: +(pg_lsn, int8) and -(pg_lsn, int8) operators |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-04-27 00:59:05 | Re: doc review for v13 |