Re: Version Numbering

From: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Version Numbering
Date: 2010-08-21 00:38:14
Message-ID: a47e8e8ef2206e6ffc96c59c23d66778@biglumber.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

> Then why are we discussing it on -hackers?

Because you will need buy in from the hackers if you
ever want to do something as radical as change to
a two-number, one dot system (or some the slightly
less radical earlier suggestions). For the record,
I'm with Tom on this: -1 to any changes.

I do like the Ubuntu/Debian way of naming the releases
with some sort of non-numeric name though. :)

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201008202036
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAkxvH+EACgkQvJuQZxSWSshfdwCgxutLw7s2o225qvhKRXeJzvwo
xVgAnAoptFyCTKljX52q7RTsGElDHswE
=yS2/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2010-08-21 01:31:44 Re: Version Numbering
Previous Message KaiGai Kohei 2010-08-21 00:27:54 Re: security hook on authorization