From: | "Jasbinder Bali" <jsbali(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Version 1 Calling convention |
Date: | 2006-08-30 04:30:28 |
Message-ID: | a47902760608292130redde58ej94fbd6b5e8de05e6@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-novice |
Well I think I can because so far its been working fine.
Anyways, as suggested by others too, I'm going to change it to SPI but right
now the matter of concern is the error that I'm getting.
Is it because I'm using ECPG in server side code or something else?
On 8/30/06, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Jasbinder Bali wrote:
> > I have a .pgc file and i have the following code snippet in it:
> >
> > PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1 (test);
> >
> > Datum
> > test (PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
> > {
> > EXEC SQL BEGIN DECLARE SECTION;
>
> You can't use ecpg in server-side functions. You need to use the SPI
> interface.
>
> --
> Alvaro Herrera
> http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
> PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jasbinder Bali | 2006-08-30 04:53:57 | Re: Version 1 Calling convention |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-08-30 04:28:15 | Re: Version 1 Calling convention |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jasbinder Bali | 2006-08-30 04:53:57 | Re: Version 1 Calling convention |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-08-30 04:28:15 | Re: Version 1 Calling convention |