| From: | Federico <rotellaro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: cost per transaction |
| Date: | 2007-04-24 06:13:18 |
| Message-ID: | a3e8e2210704232313o3c055bb7n213c304a538e39a1@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 4/24/07, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> Federico,
>
> > AFAIK, there aren't any audited public benchmarks for PostgreSQL. So,
> > you're not going to find a TPC-C or TPC-E for PostgreSQL yet. There
> > may have been one of the SPEC benchmarks that used PostgreSQL, but
> > that wouldn't have been direct OLTP.
>
> We will have an OLTP benchmark available before PGDay.it.
>
That's fantastic :)
Any hope to have 8.3 (or 9 !?!?!) available before pgday.it too?
:P
Regards
--
Federico Campoli
PGDay 2007 Committee :: http://www.pgday.it
Scopri il piu' avanzato database Libero
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gabriele Bartolini | 2007-04-24 10:48:46 | T-shirts situation |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-04-24 05:32:08 | Re: [HACKERS] Wild idea: 9.0? |