From: | walther(at)technowledgy(dot)de |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Christophe Pettus <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Regression tests fail with musl libc because libpq.so can't be loaded |
Date: | 2024-03-26 07:36:40 |
Message-ID: | a3bad2e1-d74f-458d-9ed6-2a67b329b7e4@technowledgy.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian:
> You want to risk destabilizing Postgres by backpatching something this
> complex so the regression tests can be run on all stable branches? I
> think you are overestimating our desire to take on risk.
I specifically wrote about backpatching the first (and maybe second)
patch. None of that is risky.
Patches 3-5 were not meant for backpatching at all.
Best,
Wolfgang
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | walther | 2024-03-26 07:43:54 | Re: Regression tests fail with musl libc because libpq.so can't be loaded |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2024-03-26 07:19:09 | Re: Regression tests fail with musl libc because libpq.so can't be loaded |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2024-03-26 07:36:58 | Re: make dist using git archive |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2024-03-26 07:30:45 | Re: Catalog domain not-null constraints |