From: | james bardin <jbardin(at)bu(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Warm standby with 8.1 |
Date: | 2009-08-18 16:09:25 |
Message-ID: | a3b675320908180909h5db313e9iebf45b0962a4452c@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Thanks Ken. The more I think about it, the more I feel we should move
away from upstream, and pull the latest version for this.
So on with newer versions -
When using the built-in systems for warm standby, how do I ensure that
the latest transactions have been archived? Does a clean shutdown
flush and archive the WAL within the archive_timeout period?
Thanks
-jim
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Kenneth Marshall<ktm(at)rice(dot)edu> wrote:
> James,
>
> You really, really, really should upgrade to a more recent
> release. The list of improvements and bugfixes is long and
> well worth having. 8.1 was released 4 years ago. If you
> cannot, please, please make certain that you are running
> the latest point release -- regardless of what is shipping
> with RHEL5.
>
> Good luck,
> Ken
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Anj Adu | 2009-08-18 17:44:00 | vacuum on empty table takes very long |
Previous Message | Kenneth Marshall | 2009-08-18 15:33:42 | Re: Warm standby with 8.1 |