On 2024-12-06 18:31, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 10:43:51AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
>> Yeah, people would likely use this new field to monitor long running
>> vacuum.
>> Long enough that this error should be acceptable. Do you agree?
>
> OTOH, adding the 100% accuracy looks as simple as v9-0002 attached
> (0001 is
> same as for v8), so I think we should provide it.
Thanks! The patch looks good to me.
Regards,
--
Masahiro Ikeda
NTT DATA CORPORATION