Re: Declarative partitioning - another take

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, "'Alexander Korotkov'" <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dmitry Ivanov <d(dot)ivanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Declarative partitioning - another take
Date: 2016-12-09 01:19:46
Message-ID: a35f2d56-84e4-4bcf-1bb7-daa2cce9b8d4@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2016/12/09 10:09, Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote:
> Another requirement was subpartitioning. Will this be possible with the current infrastructure, or does this need drastic change?

It does support sub-partitioning, although the syntax is a bit different.

Thanks,
Amit

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-12-09 01:22:46 Re: pgcrypto compilation error due to stack-allocated EVP_CIPHER_CTX
Previous Message Tsunakawa, Takayuki 2016-12-09 01:09:21 Re: Declarative partitioning - another take