Re: readability changes to postgres.sgml

On 8/16/19 10:41 AM, Liudmila Mantrova wrote:
>
>
> For what it's worth, I think the proposed changes are all solid
> improvements. The text reads better with them, and that's what
> this is
> about -- not whether the removed little text-pieces were 'true' or
> not.
>
> If we want to make these intros more concise, one of the easiest ways
> to achieve this is to address the reader directly ("Readers looking
> for xxx are encouraged to look" vs. smth like "For xxx, see").

This is true and my counter argument is that a call to action is more
likely to get the reader to do something.

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. || http://the.postgres.company/ || @cmdpromptinc
Postgres centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Advocate: @amplifypostgres || Get help: https://commandprompt.com/
***** Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own. *****