Re: logical replication access control patches

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: logical replication access control patches
Date: 2017-03-15 17:20:45
Message-ID: a31ef89d-889f-64fb-b1d0-d22619fbe520@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3/14/17 15:37, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> Yeah that's rather hard to say in front. Maybe safest action would be to
> give the permission to owners in 10 and revisit special privilege in 11
> based on feedback?

I'm fine with that.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-03-15 17:26:35 Re: Need a builtin way to run all tests faster manner
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-03-15 17:20:12 Re: logical replication access control patches