From: | Nikhil Sontakke <nikhil(dot)sontakke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 8.5 development schedule |
Date: | 2009-06-30 14:10:46 |
Message-ID: | a301bfd90906300710p66336ab4m71ec166201ca4de5@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
>> However, if anything, I think if anything we should go the other way
>> and start the first CommitFest July 15th.
>
> I'm curious what the counter-arguments to this are. Is it
> review-fatigue from getting the release out, or is there an economy of
> scale to building up a 100 patches before starting to review? Would
> reviewing these get some contributors moving again, thus boosting the
> total work hours available for the 8.5 release? Would it pull people
> off of WIP?
>
Agreed, especially for some of the largish WIP (like the partitioning
work for example) patches, a little effort being spent by our
reviewers on agreeing (or disagreeing right now!) on the
direction-implementation being pursued will go a long way in pulling
those efforts off from the WIP mode.
ISTM that identifying and quantifying a certain effort as small,
medium, large and having an appropriate review mechanism in place
might help too.
Regards,
Nikhils
--
http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-06-30 14:11:13 | Re: 8.5 development schedule |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2009-06-30 13:50:55 | Re: 8.5 development schedule |