Re: Vacuum statistics

From: Andrei Zubkov <zubkov(at)moonset(dot)ru>
To: Ilia Evdokimov <ilya(dot)evdokimov(at)tantorlabs(dot)com>, Alena Rybakina <a(dot)rybakina(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alena Rybakina <lena(dot)ribackina(at)yandex(dot)ru>, a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru
Subject: Re: Vacuum statistics
Date: 2024-10-16 11:17:38
Message-ID: a26674d2fcbc31505d3d1953b54dfcf98cc8954f.camel@moonset.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Ilia,

On Wed, 2024-10-16 at 13:31 +0300, Ilia Evdokimov wrote:
> BTW, I recommend renaming the view pg_stat_vacuum_database to
> pg_stat_vacuum_databaseS  for consistency with pg_stat_vacuum_tables
> and pg_stat_vacuum_indexes

Such renaming doesn't seems correct to me because
pg_stat_vacuum_database is consistent with pg_stat_database view, while
pg_stat_vacuum_tables is consistent with pg_stat_all_tables.

This inconsistency is in Postgres views, so it should be changed
synchronously.
--
regards, Andrei Zubkov

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Previous Message Ranier Vilela 2024-10-16 11:14:29 Re: replace strtok()