Re: don't create storage when unnecessary

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com
Cc: michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: don't create storage when unnecessary
Date: 2019-01-04 11:33:06
Message-ID: a1e67a2f-2fae-f064-c98f-214972ad64c6@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 18/12/2018 08:18, Amit Langote wrote:
> Sorry to be saying it late, but I have to agree with Horiguchi-san here
> that RELKIND_HAS_STORAGE sounds better and is clear.

I think I agree. Does someone want to send a patch?

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2019-01-04 11:33:48 Re: postgres_fdw: oddity in costing aggregate pushdown paths
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2019-01-04 11:25:48 commit fest app: Authors